What challenges does PKFZ face in managing its organisation to be more effective and efficient?
To be a successful free zone, PKFZ has to overcome challenges from within as well as from external factors.
The challenges for PKFZ stem from the need to provide a competitive and business-friendly environment.
Issues pertaining to the ease of doing business must be addressed and along with this, the cost of doing business is another important consideration for investors in the free zone. The organization therefore, has to be managed by a very dynamic, pro-active and customer-centric management team.
What opportunities are there for PKFZ to be the best free zone in the world?
Questions put forward by Najihah binti Josni:
1. what is the big opportunity for PKFZ to become a the best Free zone in the world?
Given the right impetus and strong Government support, PKFZ certainly has the opportunity to become one of the best Free Zones in the world.PKFZ is strategically located in South East Asia within a seamless port environment in Port Klang, currently the 15th busiest container port in the world and the region’s largest multi-purpose port. This location makes PKFZ an ideal investment hub for manufacturing, trading and logistics activities.
With the increasing liberalisation of regional trade through AFTA and China-AFTA, PKFZ is poised to become the preferred location for foreign investors seeking to expand their market outreach in the Asian region.
About the Project
The initiative started out in 1993 with the noble objective of transforming Port Klang as the national load center and regional transhipment hub. Several strategies were outlined in the Seventh Malaysia Plan leading to the creation of the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ).
The project was modelled after the Jebel Ali Free Zone in Dubai which spans an area of 12,000 acres and provides employment to over 130,000 people.
In 2008, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was commissioned under the instructions of the Minister of Transport to review the PKFZ project amidst controversy surrounding its rising costs.
Objectives of PKFZ News
The release of the PKFZ report is only the prelude to the Government’s efforts to be transparent on the issue. The findings of the report must be acted upon and the interest of the people must come first.
As we work on the roadmap to recovery for PKFZ, it is important that the people are kept informed about such efforts.
We also welcome feedback and suggestions from the people on ways and means to put PKFZ back on track for which it was originally conceived.
The objectives for the setting-up of PKFZ news website are to:
- Update the public on news and development pertaining to Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ)
- Explain the facts surrounding PKFZ from an official and professional standpoint
- Engage the public and respond to their questions with regards PKFZ issue
- Facilitate public feedback and suggestions.
We believe that constant engagement with the people is key to saving the project and ultimately make it thrive. People First, Performance Now.
The prudence and diligence of ‘ordinary men of business’
Elsewhere, perhaps 40-50km away, yet another sideshow may be taking place. Someone may be organising a press conference announcing or questioning yet another decision. The importance of the board meeting and its decisions may be side-lined and reduced to insignificance because yet another bombshell – unsubstantiated though – will be dropped to distract from more important issues. The principle is that two wrongs don’t make a right. However, some do not seem to accept this. First, it was political donations, then private jets followed by an illegal appointment. What’s next? Will it be a juicy sex scandal taken out from some B-grade X-rated movie or a tear-jerker from the studios of Bollywood or a “whodunit” thriller? We wait with bated breath.
Back to the boardroom and the facts and figures before the directors will be the involvement and the culpability of directors and senior management personnel of the PKA and PKFZ. The report will itemise their supposed wrongdoings and the specific clauses in the various legislation which had been breached. This report, needless to say, will be the basis of yet another police report and perhaps, yet another visit by its chairman, Datuk Lee Hwa Beng, to the offices of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, and yet another photo opportunity for news photographers and camera crews.
Right now, some directors and senior management staff, both present and past, would have consulted their lawyers on their status. As a pre-emptive measure, some serving staff, after having read the report by PricewaterhouseCoopers, jointly sent a letter to the prime minister stating that they had signed and certified certain documents on being directed and were at times “under duress”. There may be some truth in it and could certainly be a mitigating factor, though it will not absolve them of the blame for the mess the authority is in.
But the most important question repeatedly asked is: What is going to happen? Four reports, whose cost could run into several hundred thousand ringgit each; reports to the MACC, reports to the police and even a statement in Parliament has taken us nowhere since the precarious financial status of the PKA first made the headlines in this newspaper more than four years ago.
Many fell for the rosy reports of the “success of the PKFZ” while the impending warnings of a financial catastrophe by the auditor-general were ignored. So, were the observations by the project manager – Jebel Ali Free Trade Zone (Jafza) – when it decided to pull out.
The auditor-general had remarked on the rocky road ahead for the PKA in his 2003 report which was published the following year:
“… the authority does not have sufficient financial resources to meet this obligation. The PKA’s income before tax was between RM500,000 and RM21.19 million, whilst income after tax was between a deficit of RM1.52 million to a surplus of RM16.31 million. Based on PKA’s financial position, we are of the view that the KPA needs to look for sources of financing to meet the capital obligation of RM2.90 billion from 2007 to 2017.”
Two years later, in August 2006, Jafza international senior vice-president Chuck Heath’s letter to then Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy said it all:
“There has been a total lack of government planning … which has seen the most fundamental issues being considered and resolved only after the event rather than before.
The lack of transparency from the start had also hampered the development of the free trade zone, with Jafza not having access to relevant details of the main development contract. The board of directors’ structure has not provided any fundamental support and in fact has drawn us into political issues that have a negative impact on the development. The Malaysian political and economic landscape has too many vested interests seeking involvement and control in this project. Unfortunately, without radical surgery in cutting out the above obstacles, we feel this project is doomed to failure.”
Prophetic words by these two gentlemen who spoke the truth and flagged the future problems.
Since then, the costs have ballooned and so have the problems. So, the nine wise men who sit today, you will have to decide how you are going to go about making those responsible to be accountable for the mess they created by their indiscretion.
You have to collectively tell yourselves: “These reports were ignored deliberately. No one paid heed to anything – even Treasury regulations. They chose to do it their way with total disregard for rules and regulations and even common sense. Neither did they carry out their roles as ‘ordinary men of business’ tasked with managing people’s money running into billions. They breached the General Orders, they breached provisions in the Penal Code and other pieces of legislation. No one is above the law and that the law must take it course.”
Among you, there are one or two who feel that they are obligated to certain parties (for reasons better known to yourselves) and hence may want to pull your punches. There is no place for these sentiments because stealing public money or causing it to be stolen is inexcusable. Do not be distracted by the sideshows and the antics; you owe a duty to the taxpayers and if you abdicate from these responsibilities, we can only come to the conclusion that we have put foxes in charge of the chicken coop.